On 05/04/2006 12:35 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > For simplicity sake, I agree. Let's call this new thing > mod_cache_generic or mod_frobit. However, let's not touch mod_cache > and friends for now. > > We can rearrange things later if this new "architecture" actually has > any benefits. I am concerned that overgeneralization is going to make > things slower. So, I'd prefer to see us remove code rather than add; > but to also do it in parallel. So, I'd like to defer touching > mod_cache until we know we have something that is concretely better. -- +1. First have a working alternative to the current code and toss the current code if the new one is better (whatever better means by then exactly). Regards Rüdiger
