Davi Arnaut wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:48:05 -0500
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on visual review. Anyone have a win9x install handy to verify
that this works? Sorry, none of my multiboots still boot 9x.
I've personally tested it on WIN98 (virtual machine).
Just a heads up... during development I saw varying behavior on 95, 98,
98SE and ME. <shrug/> I would appreciate if more that one person could
test this before we commit to 2.0 or 2.2 branch. Perhaps I should create
a binary from the patch + 2.0.58/2.2.2 and let folks download that to
verify based on a plea to [EMAIL PROTECTED]