On 07/17/2006 11:50 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > personally I think GET & HEAD processing should be identical until the > very last moment.
Agreed in general, but in the case of mod_deflate doing a compression on a HEAD wastes an unnecessary high count of CPU cycles IMHO. > this avoids bugs creeping in which process the body for some reason and > add a header after mod_deflate is run What kind of problems do you imagine if I short circuit mod_deflate in the HEAD case in the way I do it? > (I can't think of any which do this BTW) > > are you seeing a problem somewhere Ruediger? The biggest problem at the moment is that I fear that I do not get your point correctly :-). So some explanations from your side would be very helpful to get myself on the correct track. Thanks and regards Rüdiger
