Jean-frederic Clere wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Pretty soon I'll be committing my "balancer set" patch to > > httpd-trunk. This basically allows for member sets within > > a balancer similar to the 'distance' mod_jk attribute. > > What it does is allow for more control over which > > members will be used via m_p_b. The logic is: > > > > > > Look for all usable members in set #0 > > If none exist, look for any host standbys in #0 > > If none exist, select the next set and loop > > > > I think this design provides the most flexibility > > for the admin. Anyway, this will require an update > > to the pertinent data struct to add the "set" element. > > I will also at this time likely add a "busy" element > > as well, in anticipation of the by-busyness LB method > > patch ;) > > > Nice I have also prepared "memory slot handler" to replace the > scoreboard space used by mod_proxy may I should wait before committing > the part that affects mod_proxy.c, proxy_util.c and mod_proxy.h? >
Yes, I'd propose waiting to commit that. The sole reason is that the member-set and other previously committed patches will likely be more readily approved for backporting to 2.2.x, whereas the scoreboard changes might be more difficult :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
