yeah, it's a bit of an overhead, but it allows
for one-to-one mapping of SVN commits to each new
feature. And it makes it easier for
people to follow what each smallish patch
does (and therefore +1 it) rather than wrapping
their heads around something larger.
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
There are lots of things to backport. IMHO its the entire HEAD,
and spread over the multiple svn commits.
How we should deal with that?
Having multiple backports or a single one?
we should simply update STATUS as usually... most of the
backports are self contained enough and non-dependent
to allow that, I think.
It looks like bureaucratic overhead to me :)
But OK, we can have multiple STATUS entries.
Regards,
Mladen.
