> "This differs from a content coding in that the transfer-coding is a > property of the message, not of the original entity." > > Based on that, it seems to be ok. However, we'd have to remove strong > ETags as a side-effect if it was done (since strong ETags change when > entity headers change).
I'm too tired - I'm not even reading my own points. Based on the above "property of the message, not property of the entity", this may not be true. I'm going to go to bed now, before I make a bigger fool of myself than I've already managed to this evening. Issac
