On 9/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun Sep 24 15:29:59 2006
New Revision: 449514
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=449514
Log:
Add extra explanatory clause to VirtualHost docs
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml?view=diff&rev=449514&r1=449513&r2=449514
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml Sun Sep 24 15:29:59 2006
@@ -3255,7 +3255,7 @@
<li>The IP address of the virtual host;</li>
<li>A fully qualified domain name for the IP address of the
- virtual host;</li>
+ virtual host (not applicable to NameVirtualHosts);</li>
That's not strictly true, as far as I know. Namevhosts will still
work if the reverse DNS of the name in the <VirtualHost> block maps to
the IP specified in NameVirtualHost. I would replace that with simply
"(not recommended)", since we advise people to never use hostnames
there, whether or not they are using name-based vhosts.
Joshua.
