Davi Arnaut wrote:
I've just described that. Maybe my English was poor in the e-mail.
Your English is spot on, unfortunately the aggressive nature of your email isn't.
You are not going to bully anybody on this list into accepting any patch, it's not how this project works.
It is quite clear to me that you are upset that your patches were not accepted as is. Unfortunately your patches break existing compliance with RFC2616 in the cache, and in the process introduce a significant performance penalty. This has been pointed out to you before, and not just by me.
Your recent comments on patches contributed have made it clear that you neither understand the patches so committed, nor have you actually run the code in question. I respectfully request you fix both these issues before continuing any work on this cache.
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
