On Tue, October 31, 2006 11:59 am, Nick Kew wrote: > It was not intended as any such thing. Just a comment noting > that we have an extremely simple case in which this caching > strategy will degrade system performance not just a little, > but by a whole order of magnitude. The lusers will love it.
I think there has been a lot of the use of "-1" lately where it's intented to mean "I disagree", rather than "I veto". I think I have been guilty of this too. Regards, Graham --
