> Von: > Justin Erenkrantz > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:15 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface > > > On 10/31/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That seems to be an important point to me. Although I never used > > the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we actually would > > have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me. Isn't this > a showstopper > > for implementing #3 as new interface? > > Honestly, mod_mem_cache is a complete joke. It's never worked
I am not quite sure if Bill (not other Bill) shares this point of view :-). Regards Rüdiger
