Joe Orton wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > > According to Jeff: > > > > > A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but > > > I don't see anything that looks like a veto. > > > > I voted -1 at that time which is a veto. > > > > My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very > > stupid idea to add a "feature" that allows our users to do > > something which is stupid and absurd. > > The motivation given by the submitter was that he pays per byte served, > it seems entirely reasonable to allow the Server header to be disabled > for such users. >
Can he install mod_security? -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
