On 12/6/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> *shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea,
>> feel free to ignore my veto.
>>
>
> A Veto is a Veto. If you feel strongly enough about it, then
> it cannot be, and should not be, ignored.
/agree - I cast a -0 because I don't like it, don't think we should
do it, but even more strongly feel we should stop answering the damned
question "can I turn off the ..." and move on :)
A moot point, but aren't a "-0" vote and the comment "even more
strongly feel we should stop answering the damned question..."
inconsistent? This isn't a vote for how cool we think the feature
would be, but for whether or not we think it should be implemented,
after weighing the different concerns.
