If anyone has a couple cycles to review this, I'd like to tar up 2.2.4 later on tonight. Since this was a nasty fault when it occurred (PR 40470) I still consider it necessary before 2.2 gets bumped.
Does anyone have other backports to point out that are showstopper quality, before I T&R? Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007 > New Revision: 492338 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492338 > Log: > Beg for review > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?view=diff&rev=492338&r1=492337&r2=492338 > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007 > @@ -198,3 +198,17 @@ > PR: 36609 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=490156&view=rev > +1: niq > + > + * mod_isapi: One last round, vetted against a number of sample ISAPI > + applications. For the patches to make those PSDK samples work, see > + > http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ms_psdk_feb2003_isapi_sample_bugfixes.diff > + Resolves PR 40470. > + Where any response is sent, return OK from the handler. Where there > + is no response (but a status code) return the code. This patch adds > + a great number of debugging emits for failed ap_pass_brigade calls, > + to help diagnose failure cases, and disambiguates OK from > APR_SUCCESS. > + Submitted by: wrowe, Matt Eaton <asf divinehawk.com> > + Patch applies to 2.2 and 2.0 as-is: > + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=492333 > + +1: wrowe > + > > > . >
