Only meant to help ASF with testing by much ppl as possible.
It is not on the (official) download page of the Apachelounge.
I stated to advise ASF, it's a RC and not released by ASF.
When I follow your advise: "... add the binaries to your ApacheLounge
***after*** the vote to release was tallied".
Then I see no way to let so much ppl test to verify the quality.
I plan to remove the binary or that they can download on request to me, a
pity.
Btw. I see no difference to publish unreleased binaries or sources like you
do.
Steffen
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 18:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review
Very true. Steffan, in order to be a community player, we prefer that
you do NOT publish unreleased binaries unless you VERY CLEARLY designate
them as YOUR release of the ASF's code. Even at that, it's in poor form.
Because you participate here, you'll see the vote tally and know when we
start the short countdown between staging the release, and sending out
the Announcement. We appreciate your enthusiasm, and encourage you to
keep building/keep posting to help us determine if the release is ready.
But we would really *prefer* you actually add the binaries to your
ApacheLounge ***after*** the vote to release was tallied, please?
Yours,
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 1/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237
one note: if 2.2.4 proves to be a dud over the next few days, it won't
be "released" by the ASF; that wasn't clear from your introductory
post
.
