Brandon Fosdick wrote: > I'm back to tinkering with mod_log_dbd again and I got to thinking about > timestamps. The current logging behavior writes the output of apr_time_now() > to the log, which naturally gives the time on the httpd server. But, the > database server also has its own timestamp functionality. Is there any reason > to favor one over the other? Any reason to do both? > > Without wanting to steal anyone's thunder, is it not more relevant to have the time from the httpd perspective, as you're logging details about interacting with that set of processes? The SQL server could be running on a different box and have a different time, which could lead to debugging confusion (be it httpd or web-application related) if they have a [slightly] different time.
If I'm wildly wrong I'll ashamedly head back to lurking again :)
