mån 2007-02-12 klockan 21:55 +0000 skrev Nick Kew: > Because the chunking filter is equipped to discard the chunk that > takes it over the limit, and substitute end-of-chunking. > If we do that in a new filter, we have to reinvent that wheel.
Not sure substitue "end-of-chunking" is a reasonable thing here. It's an abort condition, not an EOF condition. Imho you'd better abort the flow, that way telling the client that the request failed instead of silently truncating the response. But yes, the earlier you know the limit is going to be hit the better. Just not sure you will find many where the chunk size is of such size it really makes a difference, but I may be wrong.. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
