Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Feb 17, 2007, at 4:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> All US legal obligations are satisfied. Correct? > > Correct.
Thanks for confirmation. Rather than 'push this out' - I've started a dialog (at least, I hope it becomes more than typing into the bitbucket) about what that package should contain and that it meets our goals. I will send a corresponding note to testers@ (occasionally forget about that list altogether, sigh.) >> I note that Flood refers only to ASF code; if we want to ship a binary >> for folks to flood their test machines from win32 boxes (including https) >> we still need to ? > > I would need to change the notice. In any case, I am -1 to shipping > binaries of flood for any platform. No release, no binaries, Yes. What is your objection to binaries once a new release is voted on (other than not releasable because ...)? >> The incoming mod_ftp may still needs a crypto notice, as it >> facilitates ftps >> and starttls handshaking using mod_ssl's hooks to OpenSSL to provide the >> FTPImplicitSSL and FTPOptions RequireSSL directive features, and the >> ftp AUTH >> command handler. Although it derives it's ssl encryption from mod_ssl by >> way of openssl, I presume we want to add this item to our notices list >> and >> to send them a notification. Correct? > > Yes, I was just waiting for a stable link to the source. Done. And again, thank you. Bill
