On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:31:19 -0800 Basant Kukreja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > I am Basant. I work in web tier group in Sun Microsystems Inc. > > I have submitted the patch for bug 39299. > Summary : Internal Server Error (500) on COPY > URI : http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39299 > > > Can some of the committer kindly review my patch please to see if it > is acceptable or not? > Patch is against 2.2.x branch. 409 implies a condition the client can fix. Your patch tests for a particular condition that is likely to be fixable in a server with DAV up&running. But AFAICS it could also give a bogus 409, for example in the case of a newly-installed and misconfigured server. Does the DAV RFC explicitly tell us to use 409 in this instance? -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
