Nick Kew wrote: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:16:52 -0600 > "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm contemplating an HTTP/1.1-only solution, available only if the >> client is willing to present expect-header 100-continue, which would >> involve no buffering. > > In principle: > +1 if it doesn't break current functionality with HTTP/1.0 > -1 otherwise. > > To the OP: why not apply the fix suggested in the bug comments? > Define the size you want to use.
It wouldn't change existing behavior, if there's no expect-header, we cannot do a renegotiate because we have no way to confirm that the client isn't waiting for 100 continue. If the client presents 100 continue we could toggle this behavior to renegotiate immediately, prior to offering the 100 continue response.
