Joe Orton wrote: > > Can you get rid of the branches of apr/apr-util? They have no place in > the httpd SVN tree.
As 'solving' a build of apache httpd to follow the fips security policy of openssl requires a similarly fips-ified apr/apr-util, I'll leave those in place. When you've svn'ed all the other code that "doesn't belong" in httpd, including each copy of pcre and expat that "doesn't belong", then we'll talk about fixing "your issue" with this sandbox. Sandbox goes as far as demonstrating a proof of concept and means nothing until the list[s] adopt the proposed patch[es]. At that point you aren't far offbase; we must present the proposed apr changes to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list ask ask if they would adopt those, httpd can't make decisions for apr any more than we can make decisions for expat or pcre communities. If we have to provide local patches instead to apr, then we'll discuss that, but give [EMAIL PROTECTED] first crack at discussing this. Bill
