Hi 
 
          I had already tried it with Prefork MPM It works fine but the
issue is that I need it with Worker MPM. Also works with WORKER MPM if we
restrict 
          backend connection pools but that would do a lot of harm
                 
          ProxyPass        / http://application.com/
<http://application.com/>   max=1 timeout=98728
            
          So is there any thing else that can be tried or can be of help in
my case.
           
          Regards 
          Manmeet Singh
 
          
        

-----Original Message-----
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 11:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Repeated NTLM authentication boxes for OWA 2k3 with Reverse
Proxying Apache 2.2


Maybe this still works if you use the prefork MPM, because in this case the
connection pool per
server process is limited to 1 connection. Please let us know if this works
such that this can be added
as a comment to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39673
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39673> .
 
Regards
 
Rüdiger

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. März 2007 07:03
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: Repeated NTLM authentication boxes for OWA 2k3 with Reverse
Proxying Apache 2.2


         Hi Rüdiger/all
 
         Thanks for the reply 
 
         But is there any workaround available for using NTLM with MPM
worker or a way to turn off connection pooling.
         
         Regards
         Manmeet Singh
           
         
      

-----Original Message-----
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Repeated NTLM authentication boxes for OWA 2k3 with Reverse
Proxying Apache 2.2


NTLM currently does not work with httpd 2.2.x and reverse proxy
configurations due to the fact that httpd 2.2.x
uses connection pooling for its backend connections. NTLM does not respect
the fact that HTTP is a stateless
protocol. Thus is fails.
 
See also: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39673
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39673> 
 
Regards
 
Rüdiger

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. März 2007 12:56
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Repeated NTLM authentication boxes for OWA 2k3 with Reverse
Proxying Apache 2.2




Hi all 

I have made following setup with Apache 2.2 


Client <---https---> Apache 2.2.3 <--------> OWA 2k3 server 

in my conf I have 

Listen 172.25.12.146:80 
<VirtualHost 172.25.12.146:80> 
   DocumentRoot "/myroot/abc/" 
   ServerName application.owa.com 
        <IfDefine PROXY> 
          ProxyPass        / http://application.owa.com/
<http://application.owa.com/>  

        ProxyPassReverse / http://application.owa.com/
<http://application.owa.com/>  
        ProxyPassReverse / http://application.owa.com:80/
<http://application.owa.com:80/>  
        ProxyPassReverse / http://172.25.11.33/ <http://172.25.11.33/>  
        ProxyPassReverse / http://172.25.11.33:80/ <http://172.25.11.33:80/>

     </IfDefine> 
</VirtualHost> 



but when I try to connect I get repeated NTLM authentication boxes but OWA
resource is available after many attempts.If I click any other link on OWA
it again asks for NTLM authentication. 

Also the very same httpd.conf and network setup is working fine with Apache
2.0.53 hust replacing the httpd 

Is there any change in the two version regarding the same .... 

Or if anyone has experienced this .Please help......... 


Thanks/regards 
 Manmeet Singh 


The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without
copying or disclosing it.



The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without
copying or disclosing it.



The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be 
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or 
disclosing it.

Reply via email to