Well did the double configuration happen in the same thread or did there is a fork between the first and second config ?
2007/4/25, Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi to all, > > I'm trying to adapt mod_jk to i5/OS v5r4 and see the following in > mod_jk.log (debug mode) > > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] jk_uri_worker_map.c > (423): rule map size is 0 > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [error] mod_jk.c (2701): > Initializing shm:/www/dapserver/logs/jk.shm.6589 errno=3025. Load > balancing workers will not function properly. [...] > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:44 2007] [6589:0038] [info] mod_jk.c (2743): > mod_jk/1.2.22 initialized > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] jk_uri_worker_map.c > (423): rule map size is 0 > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [error] mod_jk.c (2701): > Initializing shm:/www/dapserver/logs/jk.shm.6589 errno=3025. Load > balancing workers will not function properly. [...] > [Tue Apr 17 16:23:45 2007] [6589:0038] [debug] mod_jk.c (2661): > Initialized mod_jk/1.2.22 > > It's strange but it seems the initialisation is done twice. > Is it a specific i5/OS (IBM HTTP Server power by Apache) case or general ? not so strange. Apache httpd has been running thru the config twice at initialization for a long time. most modules know how to deal with it. yes it would be more straight forward if we could just run it once, but that would require revamping the config system. Greg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
