On 07/19/2007 01:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Thu Jul 19 04:22:32 2007
> New Revision: 557576
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=557576
> Log:
> provide a 2.2.x alternative
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?view=diff&rev=557576&r1=557575&r2=557576
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Jul 19 04:22:32 2007
> @@ -283,6 +283,10 @@
>        -1: rpluem says: This patch cannot be backported as it would change
>            the ABI of a public API IMHO. This would require a major
>            bump and patches that require a major bump cannot be backported
> +      
> +          Covener says: How about this alternative to avoid sending
> +          the possibly-short enum into the LDAP SDK?
> +          http://people.apache.org/~covener/2.2.x-deref_aliases-safe.diff

This looks backportable and good to me. So I propose the following:

- Restart the vote in the STATUS file with your new proposal (you can add my +1
  immediately).
- Either revert your original patch in trunk and apply the one above or do a
  major bump on trunk. I would prefer the first option since it avoids an API
  change also in trunk and keeps the difference between trunk and 2.2.x smaller.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to