On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:10:19 +0200 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not using apr_rfc822_date instead? This is makes this function > even shorter and from a first glance apr_rfc822_date is far more > efficient then apr_strftime. Indeedie. I have no idea why not. The patch was an old one that's been languishing in bugzilla. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
