On 08/27/2007 06:45 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:29:36 +0200 > Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just wondering if there is any plans on addressing Bug #39727, >> incorrect ETag on gzip:ed content (mod_deflate). > > In the absence of a better suggestion, I'd be +1 for the little > hack you suggest in Comment #10. Bug me if (in the absence of > any objections here) I haven't applied it in 24 hours.
But without an adjusted conditional checking this leads to a failure of conditional requests. And I currently do not see how we can adjust ap_meets_conditions. As I understand 13.3.3 of RFC2616 the DEFLATE_OUT filter transforms a possible strong ETag of the response it filters into a weak ETag. So shouldn't we simply transform a strong ETag into a weak one? Regards Rüdiger
