On 08/27/2007 09:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=570074&r1=570073&r2=570074&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Mon Aug 27 04:28:22 2007 >> @@ -165,6 +165,10 @@ >> adjusted for 2.0 including both patches; >> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch >> +1: wrowe >> + rpluem says: What is the reason for the patch to Makefile.in in your >> + proposal? Besides I think >> + sed 's#i^LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) >> $(installbuilddir)/libtool $(LTFLAGS)#' >> + is wrong (Note the i before ^). >> and prior to r569934; >> +1: rpluem > > Yes, I'm a vim user who always forgets modern linux is happy to navigate and > stay in insert mode ;-) That file will not be applied, please ignore (it's
I thought just that ;-). Happened to me hundred times before. Especially if you work alternately with vi on Solaris and vi (aka vim) on Linux. Regards Rüdiger
