FYI - this bug appears to be the root of several modules no longer
behaving as expected on Win32 platforms.

It takes me back to a question I raised on apr quite a while ago,
what does *unix* do with an unset child_in/child_out/child_err
procattr member?

If it is unset, does the child inherit the processes' std handle?
AIUI - with our apr implementation, it does.

Bill
--- Begin Message ---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43329>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43329

           Summary: apr_proc_create behavior change
           Product: APR
           Version: HEAD
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: PatchAvailable
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: APR
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


apr_proc_create now passes zero instead of INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for STDIN,
STDOUT, and STDERR which are zero in the procattr.

This change was caused by Revision 568819. 

Several 2rd-party modules (mod_fcgid, mod_fascgi, mod_perl, etc.) test
explicitly for INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE and are broken by this behavior change.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- End Message ---

Reply via email to