> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Joe Orton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 11:35 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote: > > > That was the goal of my diagnostic patch: Finding out if > we have a pool > > > issue. Looks like we have. I guess the right fix is as you say > > > to use the parent pool (process scope). > > > > Not 100% sure regarding the correct pool, but would that be > the correct fix > > That's not really thread-safe, and it ought to be, though we > might get > away with it since it's called during startup. But rather > than guessing > pools, actually caching the stuff once at startup is probably > cleanest, > e.g.:
Looks good for me. Thanks for working this out. I assume the pool given to ssl_register_hooks is a very long living pool that lasts as long as the process lives. Mind to attach this patch to PR43334 (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43334)? Regards Rüdiger