> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Joe Orton  
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 11:35
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote:
> > > That was the goal of my diagnostic patch: Finding out if 
> we have a pool
> > > issue. Looks like we have. I guess the right fix is as you say 
> > > to use the parent pool (process scope).
> > 
> > Not 100% sure regarding the correct pool, but would that be 
> the correct fix
> 
> That's not really thread-safe, and it ought to be, though we 
> might get 
> away with it since it's called during startup.  But rather 
> than guessing 
> pools, actually caching the stuff once at startup is probably 
> cleanest, 
> e.g.:

Looks good for me. Thanks for working this out. I assume the pool given
to ssl_register_hooks is a very long living pool that lasts as long as 
the process lives.
Mind to attach this patch to PR43334 
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43334)?

Regards

Rüdiger

Reply via email to