William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > There seems to be troubles in paradise. cc'ing httpd who had > recently updated mime-types. > > Best I can figure, this is really "application/x-tar+x-gzip" (or would > that be "application/x-gzip+x-tar"?) if we don't want to (and we don't > want to) advertise the content stream as gzip'ed (preventing automatic > inflation which would cause md5/asc sigs to mismatch). >
It should also be noted that this has been discussed here before, in February of 2003 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200302.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
