Rather than call it X-Sendfile, can we perhaps adopt the generic Script-Control header mechanism as outlined in CGI 1.2.
http://cgi-spec.golux.com/cgi-120-00a.html As one example of how Script-Control has been used, see: http://www.openvms-rocks.com/ht_root/src/httpd/cgi.c I have been contemplating using Script-Control headers as a means of Python WSGI applications controlling Apache when using mod_wsgi. It would be nice to push forward with such an idea and standardise on some Script-Control directives that everyone would use rather than using different strings for the same thing. Graham On 17/09/2007, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on concept. > > Shouldn't we consider moving X-Sendfile into another module or the core? > > It can be useful for regular CGIs or proxied stuff too.. > > > André Malo wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > There's a new gateway module implementing the SCGI protocol[1] and I'd like > > to add it to the tree within the next days. I've uploaded everything about > > it here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~nd/mod_proxy_scgi/ > > > > complete.patch contains mod_proxy_scgi.c, mod_proxy_scgi.xml, config.m4 of > > the proxy directory and mod_rewrite (added the scgi scheme). > > > > For convenience and better review I've put the plain module and docs into > > the directory as well. > > > > Thanks, nd > > > > [1] http://python.ca/scgi/protocol.txt > >
