On Wed, October 10, 2007 3:27 pm, rahul wrote: > It would be nice to have different modules for reverse proxy and forward > proxy.. from an FTP perspective. > > There is a fairly large difference in FTP (and perhaps in other protocols > too) in terms of the optimizations that needs to be done for forward proxy > and reverse proxy. > > In forward proxy, we can not assume the kind of ftp servers the client > requests. So when there is an error of some sort we should try again > with a syntax that might be acceptable to the next possible type of > server. > > In the reverse proxy, this is wrong, and introduces unnecessary > overheads in network traffic (where it would be simpler to ask the user > to provide the type of server in the backend and error out if the ftp > server returns error.)
There is no need to have separate module to achieve this - providing a mechanism to override certain behaviour when the administrator wants it, but defaulting to RFC compliant behaviour will achieve the same thing. Regards, Graham --
