On 10/11/2007 04:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Thu Oct 11 07:12:02 2007
> New Revision: 583829
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=583829&view=rev
> Log:
> Add fix for, as of now, unconfirmed issue...
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=583829&r1=583828&r2=583829&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Thu Oct 11 07:12:02 2007
> @@ -207,6 +207,12 @@
>       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582631
>       +1: niq
>  
> +    * modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c (ap_proxy_http_register_hook): Fix
> +      apr_pool_cleanup_register() invocation added in r583202, which was
> +      causing every apr_proc_create() call to segfault.
> +      Trunk version of patch:
> +        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=583813
> +

I assume you are +1 on your proposal, right :-)?

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to