On 10/15/2007 10:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Mon Oct 15 13:13:39 2007 > New Revision: 584886 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584886&view=rev > Log: > New proposal; resolve docs conflict in old proposal. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=584886&r1=584885&r2=584886&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Mon Oct 15 13:13:39 2007 > @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ > I'm OK with that if others feel happier that way. The function > declaration presumably remains in http_protocol.h, so no API change. > > + * mod_proxy_http: Document environment variables used by this module > + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582476 > + +1: niq > +
Documentation changes need no votes for backporting. So just do it. Anyway I am +1. Regards Rüdiger
