On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
* The second is more complex. Because of the order of changes
to trunk, it needs the first as prerequisite. To make a separate
change for it would necessarily invalidate the other patch.
There are far too many interlinked combinations here to deal with
individually. So if the veto stands, I think I'll just have to
replace both proposals with a combined patch for both bugs.
Unless someone has a better idea?
I think that a combined patch that addresses both "bugs" makes the
most sense... I can't see approving one and not the other, due
to the effects on existing users :)
