On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:47:53AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think the idea is that mod_serf is not intended to be a complete > replacement for mod_proxy *at this time*... It's a cool start > and a basis to build on. > The name makes me think of it as a provider module like httpd - in fact I think that'd be quite useful (especially going by Justins reluctance to add it to apr-util which would have been my preferred location).
vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
