On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:38:28 -0500 "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the intention for the UNHANDLED case? The code/comments > seem to imply we'll end up in the "respect CL" path. Exactly. The alternative is to reject it, which might risk breaking something that worked before. The current fix falls back to old behaviour in the have-CL-bad-TE case, so there's no risk of regression. What else do you think we should do in that case? Perhaps logging an error would be a good idea. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
