Hi Bill, > Keep in mind we can't use @@LoadModules@@ though - not with a in tree > build. aah yes, true.
> What about @@LoadFtpModules@@ instead? If that's the preference, I don't > mind changing the unix/win32 direction either. fine - I've changed as you suggested. >> how about other replacements to come closer to what we have in >> httpd.conf.in / ssl.conf.in ? >> >> f.e. s/\/logs\//\/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]//g and so on (path to certs etc.), >> and quoting these also? > +1; I don't see it as a 0.9.1 beta showstopper, but it would be great. done, please check if I did it right - I'm a bit short in time at the moment, and can only look later again into it.... Guen.
