Speaking of 3+1's
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If anyone objects to
@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
apr_file_t *infile;
apr_dbm_t *outdbm;
- apr_initialize();
+ apr_app_initialize(&argc, &argv, NULL);
atexit(apr_terminate);
verbose = 0;
I'm happy to revert the whole thing. Sorry for treating this as
a platform patch issue; it does touch other platforms.
There's no 2.0.x of this file, but if someone would add a third +1
(Rudiger blessed this on the 21st) for this 2.2.x backport, that
would be nice, and consistent with our policy. (That other crufty
whitespace change was already backed out.)
Bill
