Mladen Turk wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:35 +0800
Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, I'll report back on my experiments...
I look forward to it:-)
I have done some more investigation and have written up a proposal
for my intended approach to this VFS requirement.
http://privsep.org/AprVirtualFileSystem
Have you seen the:
http://apvfs.sourceforge.net/
I did this project back in 2003, and reading your
posts it's completely with the same scope ;)
Perhaps now is the time to revive it.
Yes indeed. Nick pointed it out to me. It is very close to what I need
and has the same scope.
I have a link to apvfs on the wiki page above which outlines some of the
additional requirements (mainly for transparency to httpd. i.e. a VFS
working within APR's existing File IO API, secondly a way to pass down
request_rec* context to a VFS module, and a few other bits and bobs,
such as inheritable buffering, etc to minimise what a VFS module has to
implement). Perhaps we can work together on this?
Michael.
