I'm getting a whole lot of errors with vs 2008 and 2005 on windows:

Apr seems to be to blame:
---
Error   1       error C2079: 'mip' uses undefined struct
'group_source_req'      
s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  140     apr
Error   2       error C2224: left of '.gsr_interface' must have struct/union
type    s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  171     
apr
Error   3       error C2224: left of '.gsr_group' must have struct/union
type    s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  172     
apr
Error   4       error C2224: left of '.gsr_group' must have struct/union
type    s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  172     
apr
Error   5       error C2168: 'memcpy' : too few actual parameters for
intrinsic function      
s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  172     apr
Error   6       error C2224: left of '.gsr_source' must have struct/union
type    s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  173     
apr
Error   7       error C2224: left of '.gsr_source' must have struct/union
type    s:\source\x86\httpd-2.2\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\multicast.c  173     
apr
---

Anybody else seeing this? wrowe?


On Jan 4, 2008 11:03 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >      http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +1 for 2.2.7.
>
> Tested on Mac OS 10.5.1 (aka 9.1.0) with APR/APR-util 1.2.12.
>
> Some caveats though on Mac OS - I have a hunch they are more about the
> test suite than anything else.
>
> Configure options:
>
> ./configure --enable-modules=most --enable-ssl --enable-cache
> --enable-proxy --enable-disk-cache
>
> With httpd-test, the built-in Perl distro yields these failures:
>
> Failed Test                Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t                2    1  50.00%  1
> t/ssl/basicauth.t                         3    2  66.67%  2-3
> t/ssl/env.t                              30   23  76.67%  1-8 16-30
> t/ssl/extlookup.t                         2    2 100.00%  1-2
> t/ssl/fakeauth.t                          3    2  66.67%  2-3
> t/ssl/headers.t                           3    3 100.00%  1-3
> t/ssl/pr12355.t                          10    8  80.00%  1-8
> t/ssl/pr43738.t                           4    4 100.00%  1-4
> t/ssl/proxy.t                           172  113  65.70%  60-172
> t/ssl/require.t                           5    2  40.00%  2 5
> t/ssl/v2.t                                1    1 100.00%  1
> t/ssl/varlookup.t                        72   72 100.00%  1-72
> t/ssl/verify.t                            3    1  33.33%  2
> 8 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
> Failed 13/80 test scripts, 83.75% okay. 234/2824 subtests failed, 91.71% okay.
> [  error] error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
>
> Looking deeper, I replaced Perl with current MacPort perl install and I now 
> get:
>
> (The key bit seems it upgrades libwww-perl/5.805 to libwww-perl/5.808.)
>
> Failed Test       Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/ssl/basicauth.t                3    2  66.67%  2-3
> t/ssl/env.t                     30   15  50.00%  16-30
> t/ssl/extlookup.t                2    2 100.00%  1-2
> t/ssl/fakeauth.t                 3    2  66.67%  2-3
> t/ssl/pr12355.t                 10    8  80.00%  1-8
> t/ssl/pr43738.t                  4    4 100.00%  1-4
> t/ssl/require.t                  5    2  40.00%  2 5
> t/ssl/varlookup.t               72   72 100.00%  1-72
> t/ssl/verify.t                   3    1  33.33%  2
> 8 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
> Failed 9/80 test scripts, 88.75% okay. 108/2824 subtests failed, 96.18% okay.
> [  error] error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
>
> Looking at the error and access logs, httpd is returning success and
> failures where appropriate, but LWP is somehow dying.  So, I'll cast
> my +1 even with these SSL failures as merely changing the LWP version
> made some of these go away.  If someone wants to dig more and see
> what's up, that'd be appreciated too...but I wouldn't block the
> release on this.  -- justin
>



-- 
~Jorge

Reply via email to