On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:25:54 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, one sees that we've done it both ways. > Consider 2.2.5 and 2.2.1. Same with the 2.0.x > ones as well... > > Looking back, I prefer keeping the "old" way, where > once we've tagged, we have a corresponding entry > in CHANGES... My intent is to keep the 2.2.7, > 2.0.62 and 1.3.40 lines in CHANGES. Agreed. I'd have preferred not wiping 2.2.5 from the record, but not strongly enough to make a fuss. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
