On 1/11/08, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> >
> > libaprutil is still set to x64 instead of win32 when compiling under
> > 2008 but I take this will get fixed in the win32 src package
>
> No; you set it; that is to say that visual studio is bugged, and VC6
> .dsw did not specify per-project dependencies, VS .sln migration makes
> foolish associations.  This is even true when I introduce x64 targets
> to all projects, it has nothing to do with the source .dsw/.dsp files.
> You need to update these; there may be a separate package that offers
> .sln's at some point to fix VS bugs, haven't decided.  (The src package
> is intended to be built from exported .mak files).
>
> > multicast.c is still broken using vs 2008 with the latest platform
> > SDK, vs 2005 with the older platform SDK works fine! (there is a patch
> > for this... IIRC its also in apr trunk but it was laten when I was
> > talking about this with wrowe I can't remember for certain)
>
> It's also on apr branches but not yet released;
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40398
>
> the patch applied to apr was the Cleaner and not Dirtier flavor.
>
> It will hit the next 1.2.x apr release, I'd presume there will be one
> sooner or later.
>
> > FWIW: BuildBin's installdir is still set to /apache2 instead of
> > /apache22 not that will effect anything just something I noticed.
>
> Yup - no impact, not likely to change.
>
> > The /machine not set warnings are still there aswel but again no
> > problem here since it defaults to x86
>
> or defaults to x64 using that compiler/linker.  Again, goofy win32
> behaviors, and can't be fixed without x64 + win32 (x86) targets which
> would permit compilation using two-different targets.
>
> It was more than I wanted to mess with for this point bump, but will
> probably get back to that issue over the next several weeks.
>
>

I'd be willing to generate and package vs 2008 sln and fix the
apr-util goofyness.
Say if  solution files are created... do we want different packages
for 2005, 2008,...?

2008 is said to be compatible with 2005 but opening a 2005 sln in 2008
it still randomly changes settings and such.

Say if I create such a extended package based on the office 2.2.8
win32 src do you think that could be useful? I can always place it on
my own website for interested people but I suspect it won't get much
attention there and won't be worth the hassle.

-- 
~Jorge

Reply via email to