On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Oops. My fault. We need to continue in the loop, but I guess we can do the following to avoid an unneeded strncasecmp
Huh? If real isn't a balancer, then we drop to the orig impl. If it is, then we try to find the right worker and, when we find it, we match and return. If we are a balancer but don't find a worker, we drop through anyway. I guess your point is that you don't like the drop through on the found-balancer-but-didn't-find- worker case... is that right? The reason I didn't is that I didn't want to too much overload the idea of special schemes. Treat balancer: special for what we know, but even if we don't find a member, continue on as we would not matter what the scheme :)
