On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Jim Jagielski > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 15:51 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 > > > > I'm back from a few days away and offline, and like to get > > the momentum for 2.2.9 back up. > > > > 2 main things: > > > > 1. There are a number of backport proposals looking > > for and waiting for a 3rd +1... if you have time > > to look/review/vote, that would be good. > > > > 2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x... > > My pref would be 1.3. > > Ship with 1.3, but do not make it depend on 1.3 yet. This makes it > easy to swap in 1.2.x again if it turns out that there is something > nasty in 1.3. We can can make it dependant on 1.3 in 2.2.10 or 2.2.11 > depending on our experience. > > Regards > > Rüdiger > I really like this proposal (my non counting +1 on this) -- ~Jorge
