On 05/12/2008 08:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008
New Revision: 655594

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=655594&view=rev
Log:
backport proposal:

   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=645813

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=655594&r1=655593&r2=655594&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008
@@ -187,6 +187,16 @@
         bump. Not sure what style and typo changes are required.
    jim: Latest rev of patch should address stated concerns :)
+ * mod_proxy: In the case that we fail to read the response line
+   from the backend and if we are a reverse proxy request, shutdown
+   the connection WITHOUT ANY response to trigger a retry by the client
+   if allowed (as for idempotent requests).
+   Trunk version of patch:
+       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=645813
+   Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
+       Trunk version works
+ +1:

I assume you are +1 as well :-)?

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to