Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I did some research on BZ 44995 and BZ 45092 and stumbled into the following
observation:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
just a little background for the time being, not intended to address
the points you raise
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=114012084824065&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=114019226127669&w=2
Thanks for those pointers. Indeed the code fragment cited in my post
tries to handle those situations and I don't intend to remove them. What
seems to strong for me, is the check for non-emptiness of the reason
phrase. Checking consistency between the status codes in r->status and
r->status_line is still needed.
Regards,
Rainer
