Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I hope my answer considered this enough :-). BTW: Thanks for taking care of the issue.
No trouble. Consider this, the flavor of autoconf the RM chooses, unlike all of our backport votes, has no scrutiny beyond the test of the tarball (hardly even CTR). But if you like I will add a STATUS entry for scrutiny of the last set of configure.in / build/*.m4 patches corresponding to branches/2.2. Or a +1 is on list is identical. Bill
