On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:51:54 -0400 "Eric Covener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:09:23 -0400 > > "Eric Covener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is it kosher to pull the API extension from trunk? A less intrusive > >> (AuthnProviderAlias-only) solution occurred to me while reading > >> your note. Would the (incorrect) minor bump be left in place or > >> can it be reverted? > > > > I'd say it wants a major bump that'll draw the line under likely > > breakage. Fortunately that's allowed in /trunk/. > > > > For clarification, you're saying a major bump to remove > has_realm_hash() right in favor of a simpler solution? Yep. Since you have a solution that doesn't break the API, use it and revert the API change. The major bump draws a line under any incompatible usage that may have happened in the meantime. > The following [chop] Not reviewing that now, but will try and find time for it if you implement it. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
