On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:12:39 -0400 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > More comments possibly later. > > > > For the most part, it looks like many of the optimizations > in mod_substitute, esp regarding efficient use of buckets, > is lacking in mod_sed... Anecdotal and benchmark data suggest that it's competitive in performance terms. Now that it's in svn, we can further improve it. Ruediger's comments look like a start on that. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
