On Fri, September 19, 2008 11:18 am, Jim Jagielski wrote: > A better interpretation would be, I think, the number of keepalive > requests on that connection. So a '1' would be the 1st keepalive > request, 2 would be the 2nd, etc... So a '0' would be the > initial request, and would be applicable whether keepalives > are enabled or not. This would make the logic simpler.
That works. The remaining issue, which is minor, is that since ap_set_keepalive() doesn't increment connection->keepalives on the last request, the value logged will be N-1 for both the N-1 and N'th keepalive request. But I don't imagine most connections will ever see the N'th keepalive request. -- Dan Poirier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
